Acer vs ASUS

Both ASUS and Acer are well-known multinational computer hardware and electronics companies originating from Taiwan. They offer a wide range of products, including monitors. Here are the details of each brand:

ASUS

Asus offers a diverse selection of monitors, ranging from high-end models like the ProArt Display PA32UCX-PK to more budget-friendly options such as the ASUS VS228H-P. The ProArt Display PA32UCX-PK is one of Asus’ most expensive monitors, designed for professionals who require accurate color reproduction and larger screen size for multitasking. Its 32-inch display, 1200 cd/m2 brightness, 10-bit color depth, and greater swivel range make it an excellent choice for creative professionals. However, it’s lower PPI and larger screen size may not be suitable for users with limited desk space or those who prefer sharper images.

On the other end of the spectrum, the ASUS VS228H-P is an affordable option targeted toward casual users and those on a tight budget. This monitor features a 21.5-inch display, full HD resolution, and a 5-ms response time, making it suitable for everyday computing tasks and light gaming. However, it lacks the color accuracy, brightness, and ergonomic features found in the more expensive ProArt Display PA32UCX-PK, making it less ideal for professional applications. Both monitors cater to different user preferences and needs, demonstrating the wide variety of choices available in the Asus monitor lineup.

Most Expensive ASUS Monitor:

  • Model: ASUS ProArt PA32UCX-PK
  • Price: Around $2,743.24
  • Resolution: 3840 x 2160
  • Display Type: IPS

Cheapest ASUS Monitor:

  • Model: ASUS VS228H-P
  • Price: Around $146.50
  • Resolution: 1920 x 1080
  • Display Type: Non-Glare TN

Acer

Acer offers a broad range of monitors to cater to various needs and budgets, from high-end models like the Acer Predator X27 to more affordable options such as the Acer R240HY. The Acer Predator X27 is one of Acer’s most expensive monitors, specifically designed for gaming enthusiasts and users seeking a premium visual experience. This monitor boasts a 27-inch display, 4K resolution, 144Hz refresh rate, 163 PPI, and 30-bit color depth, providing a vibrant and immersive experience for gamers and content consumers alike. However, its higher price tag may not suit users with budget constraints or those who do not require the advanced features it offers.

On the other hand, the Acer R240HY is a budget-friendly option aimed at casual users and those looking for a cost-effective solution for everyday computing tasks. With a 23.8-inch display, full HD resolution, and an IPS panel for better color reproduction and viewing angles, this monitor offers decent performance for its price range. However, it lacks the high refresh rate, resolution, and color depth found in the more expensive Acer Predator X27, making it less suitable for gaming enthusiasts and professional applications. Both monitors cater to different user preferences and needs, showcasing the versatility and variety in Acer’s monitor lineup.

Most Expensive Acer Monitor:

  • Model: Acer Predator X27
  • Price: Around $1,800
  • Resolution: 3840 x 2160
  • Display Type: IPS / White LED

Cheapest Acer Monitor:

  • Model: Acer R240HY
  • Price: Around $109
  • Resolution: 1920 x 1080
  • Display Type: IPS, W-LED

As we can see, the most expensive monitors from both brands have 4K resolution and IPS display types, while the cheapest monitors have Full HD resolution and different display types (TN for ASUS and W-LED for Acer). The ASUS ProArt PA32UCX-PK is the most expensive among the four, with advanced features designed for professional use, while the Acer R240HY offers the lowest price for a budget-friendly option.

When choosing a monitor, it’s important to consider the features that are most relevant to your needs. Here’s a more detailed comparison of the most expensive and cheapest monitors from ASUS and Acer, focusing on their key features and specifications:

ASUS ProArt PA32UCX-PK (Most Expensive ASUS Monitor):

  • Price: Around $2,743.24
  • Screen Size: 32 inches
  • Resolution: 3840 x 2160 (4K)
  • Display Type: IPS
  • Refresh Rate: 60 Hz
  • Response Time: 5 ms (GTG)
  • HDR: HDR10, HLG, and Dolby Vision
  • Color Gamut: 99% Adobe RGB, 89% Rec. 2020, 100% sRGB
  • Connectivity: HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2, USB Type-C, USB 3.0

ASUS VS228H-P (Cheapest ASUS Monitor):

  • Price: Around $146.50
  • Screen Size: 21.5 inches
  • Resolution: 1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
  • Display Type: Non-Glare TN
  • Refresh Rate: 60 Hz
  • Response Time: 5 ms (GTG)
  • HDR: None
  • Color Gamut: Not specified
  • Connectivity: HDMI, DVI-D, VGA

Acer Predator X27 (Most Expensive Acer Monitor):

  • Price: Around $1,800
  • Screen Size: 27 inches
  • Resolution: 3840 x 2160 (4K)
  • Display Type: IPS / White LED
  • Refresh Rate: 144 Hz (Overclockable)
  • Response Time: 4 ms (GTG)
  • HDR: HDR10
  • Color Gamut: 99% Adobe RGB
  • Connectivity: HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4, USB 3.0

Acer R240HY (Cheapest Acer Monitor):

  • Price: Around $109
  • Screen Size: 23.8 inches
  • Resolution: 1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
  • Display Type: IPS, W-LED
  • Refresh Rate: 60 Hz
  • Response Time: 4 ms (GTG)
  • HDR: None
  • Color Gamut: Not specified
  • Connectivity: HDMI, DVI, VGA

The most expensive monitors from both brands, ASUS ProArt PA32UCX-PK and Acer Predator X27, are designed for different purposes. The ASUS ProArt PA32UCX-PK is focused on professional use, with excellent color accuracy and multiple HDR standards, making it suitable for graphic designers, photographers, and video editors. The Acer Predator X27, on the other hand, is a gaming monitor with a high refresh rate and low response time, making it ideal for gamers seeking smooth gameplay and accurate colors.

Detailed Comparison of expensive variants

The cheapest monitors, ASUS VS228H-P and Acer R240HY are more suited for everyday use, such as browsing the internet, watching videos, and light gaming. They offer Full HD resolution and decent performance at their respective price points. When choosing between these budget-friendly options, consider the specific features you need and your budget constraints.

Here’s a comparison table of the most expensive monitors from ASUS and Acer:

FeatureProArt Display PA32UCX-PK (a)Acer Predator X27 (b)
Screen Size32 inches27 inches
PPI138163
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Brightness1200 cd/m2600 cd/m2
Display Colors10-bit30-bit
Swivel (Left, Right)60-90 degrees20-20 degrees
PriceAround $2,743.24Around $1,800
Resolution3840 x 2160 (4K)3840 x 2160 (4K)
Display TypeIPSIPS / White LED
Refresh Rate60 Hz144 Hz (Overclockable)
Response Time5 ms (GTG)4 ms (GTG)
HDRHDR10, HLG, and Dolby VisionHDR10
Color Gamut99% Adobe RGB, 89% Rec. 2020, 100% sRGB99% Adobe RGB, 100% sRGB
ConnectivityHDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2, USB Type-C, USB 3.0HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4, USB 3.0

This table provides a side-by-side comparison of the key features of the ASUS ProArt PA32UCX-PK and the Acer Predator X27, highlighting their differences and similarities. The ASUS ProArt PA32UCX-PK is designed for professional use with its wide color gamut and multiple HDR standards, while the Acer Predator X27 is geared towards gaming with its high refresh rate and low response time.

Comparison Table for cheapest variants

Here’s a comparison table of the cheapest monitors from ASUS and Acer:

FeatureASUS VS228H-PAcer R240HY
PriceAround $146.50Around $109
Screen Size21.5 inches23.8 inches
Resolution1920 x 1080 (Full HD)1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
Display TypeNon-Glare TNIPS, W-LED
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
Response Time5 ms (GTG)4 ms (GTG)
HDRNoneNone
Color GamutNot specifiedNot specified
ConnectivityHDMI, DVI-D, VGAHDMI, DVI, VGA

This table provides a side-by-side comparison of the key features of the ASUS VS228H-P and the Acer R240HY, highlighting their differences and similarities. Both monitors are budget-friendly options designed for everyday use, offering Full HD resolution and decent performance. The ASUS VS228H-P features a TN panel, while the Acer R240HY uses an IPS W-LED panel, which may offer better color accuracy and wider viewing angles.

Pros and Cons

ProArt Display PA32UCX-PK (a) Pros and Cons:

Pros:

  1. A larger screen size (32 inches) provides more screen real estate and is better for multitasking.
  2. Higher brightness (1200 cd/m2) for better visibility in well-lit environments.
  3. 10-bit color depth for accurate color reproduction, suitable for professional photo and video editing.
  4. Greater swivel range (60-90 degrees) for more flexible viewing angles and ergonomics.

Cons:

  1. Lower PPI (138) compared to the Acer Predator X27, which could result in slightly less sharp images.
  2. The larger screen size might not be suitable for users with limited desk space.

Acer Predator X27 (b) Pros and Cons:

Pros:

  1. Higher PPI (163) for sharper images and better visual experience.
  2. 30-bit color depth for a wider range of colors, providing richer and more vibrant visuals.
  3. Smaller screen sizes (27 inches) may be more suitable for users with limited desk space or who prefer a more compact monitor.

Cons:

  1. Lower brightness (600 cd/m2) compared to the ProArt Display PA32UCX-PK, which could be less suitable for well-lit environments.
  2. Smaller screen sizes may not be ideal for multitasking or professional applications that require more screen real estate.
  3. Limited swivel range (20-20 degrees) for less flexibility in viewing angles and ergonomics.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both Acer and Asus offer a wide range of monitors to cater to various user needs and budgets. Acer, with its Predator series, targets gaming enthusiasts who seek high refresh rates, fast response times, and vibrant visuals. On the other hand, Asus, through its ProArt series, focuses on delivering accurate color reproduction, ergonomic features, and larger screen sizes for creative professionals. When comparing Acer and Asus monitors, it’s essential to consider the specific requirements and preferences of the individual user, as both brands excel in different aspects. Ultimately, the choice between Acer and Asus monitors comes down to personal needs, budget, and the features that matter most to the user.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *